Gcc for mac 4.93/15/2023 ![]() If LLVM can (quoting the insert) surpass GCC with this release method, then why should GCC not adapt a more rapid pace to accomodate contemporary fashions in opensource? Adapt or die.īTW, has anybody else noticed the change in time? Way back when, GPL:ing your compiler was the right thing to do, forcing it to be open source. If it does, that bug is closed, with no more thought to it. Just try and file a bug against last year's clang, and the first question asked is "does it work on 3.3?". ![]() Strange - everyone is constantly using the bleeding edge Clang, as a new version is popped out every six months, and nobody is complaining about that (loudly, at least).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |